Lecture 1: Tom's response
Tom's response to the first lecture of the 2005 series of Reith lectures
The bicycle was a nifty invention. Sir Alec Broers is correct, however, to put it in its place in the ranking of ‘great British inventions’.
I share his enthusiasm for achievements in science and engineering. But are plagues really under control? Is travelling a few hours to cross the globe such a desirable achievement? Is accessing billions of words from your desk such an advantage? And for whom are these achievements available? And is technology determining the future of the human race… or is it the other way round - the human race steering technology and thereby determining what priorities are set and which solutions are sought?
Increasingly, the headlong advances of science and technology leave the world all out of kilter. ‘We’ can fly faster across the world, ‘we’ can expect a longer life, ‘we’ can process more information. But where does this leave others? Picking up the crumbs?
Globally – as any international statistics will demonstrate – the human race and its technologies have failed to alleviate world hunger, to improve child and maternal mortality rates, to reduce environmental degradation, and still less to make 'all information available to everyone'. The technological potential is there but the opportunity is not taken. This failing is mostly about a lack of political will. But engineers cannot wash their hands of such responsibilities either.
Content last updated: 04/04/2005
About Tom
Tom Hewitt has worked in international development for the last 20 years. From 1989 to 2002, he was a member of academic staff at the OU specialising in the teaching of development management and researching technology and development (particularly in Brazil and East Africa).He is now coordinator of the Child Rights Information Network (CRIN) at Save the Children UK.
