skip to main content

You Are Here: Home / Learning / Science, Technology and Nature / The World Around Us / Lecture 5 - Derek's response
 
The world around us
 

Lecture 5: Derek's Response

 

More about the lectures

Get more background on the lectures; listen to recordings and read the transcripts on the BBC Radio 4 Reith Lectures site.

Our experts' views

'Global warming and nuclear emissions know no boundaries'
Joyce Fortune

'Technology cannot make us less profligate'
Derek Matravers

'Suddenly, Lord Broers is less gung-ho about technology'
Tom Hewitt

'Public engagement with technology - rather than merely understanding of science -is a worthy pursuit'
Nick Braithwaite

Derek's response to the final lecture of the 2005 series of Reith lectures

It is very heartening to find Lord Broers paying such attention to the debate over sustainability and the environment. The suggestions he makes with respect to greater finesse with co-ordination, and a reappraisal of nuclear energy seem sensible to me, and I hope his optimism is justified.

However, it would be naïve to assume (and I am sure Lord Broers does not assume) that technology will always be able to get us out of whatever holes it (and other things) have put us in. For example, Lord Broers says that, in the cases he considers, ‘profligate waste is a result of the inability of our public decision making process to implement in time what our business and technical experts have been telling us for years about…growth’.

There are two courses of action we can take with respect to such predictions (provided we accept them). First, we can, as Lord Broers suggests, make changes so as to accommodate them. Second, we can change the way we do things such that the growth does not occur. Technology can enable us to get more for less, and can enable us to monitor our profligacy more closely.

However, it cannot make the fundamental changes that would make us less profligate.

There is an interesting question about the extent of our obligations to future generations. On the assumption that we do have these obligations, technology will lessen our problems - but, as Lord Broers intimates, it will not solve them. This is an easy pious thought to have: if one really thinks through what sustainable development involves, it is not obvious that when it comes to the choice between our comfort and future generations, it will be the latter that win out.

Content last updated: 04/05/2005

Derek Matravers

About Derek

Dr Derek Matravers is a Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at The Open University. Before that, he was a Research Fellow at Darwin College Cambridge. He is the author of Art and Emotion (OUP, 1998) and numerous articles on aesthetics and ethics.

 

Bookmark with:

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit
  • Stumbleupon
Please wait while loading. You must have JavaScript enabled to view star ratings.
 

Comments

Please wait while loading. You must have JavaScript enabled to view comments.
 
 

Explore Open2

Penguin

Two members of the Life team go in search of penguins in their natural environment. See what they find on Deception Island.

Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe

Would you say you're a Christian? Share your views, and learn about the views of others, in our new Christianity survey.

Breaking news, 1940s style

Keep up to date with our Twitterfeeds of latest news from Open2 and alerts of OU programmes on the BBC.

 
 

Site info and help